Board Couples

laughingcrow · Post by **laughingcrow** » Sat Nov 08, 2003 1:25 pm

Mr Misery said...

Diana Crow.

What gave it away??? Sorry, it seemed funny at the time, and I was at a loose end!

Post by **BlueChair** » Sat Nov 08, 2003 1:27 pm

laughingcrow,

Didn't I already explain my moderator powers to you?

laughingcrow · Post by **laughingcrow** » Sat Nov 08, 2003 1:29 pm

Yeah...but I did from a computer at work!

Dohhhh....foiled again!!!

El Vez · Post by **El Vez** » Sat Nov 08, 2003 2:51 pm

BlueChair wrote:
Smallfaces1 wrote:Porn is good. Without it we'd all be stuck in the 20's,30's,40's etc not daring to speak of sex and only having having it on our wedding nights!
You need to watch the History of Sex documentary. There was lots of sex and pornography in the 20's, 30's, and 40's, it was just more repressed, like alcohol!

I think Henry Miller said it best in REDS, "There was just as much fucking going on back then as there is today." If anything, it was a lot wilder and more free-spirited. People could screw each other and at worst worry about carpet burn or the clap. Now, to quote Joni Mitchell, sex kills. While I'm referencing artists I like so much, I'll end this post with a philosophical nugget from the great Bill Hicks.

"The day they invent a one-shot, no problem cure for AIDS....on that day there's gonna be fucking in the streets with people screaming 'It's over'!"

sulkygirl · Post by **sulkygirl** » Sat Nov 08, 2003 10:27 pm

Copenhagen Fan wrote:It's clear that most of the women on this board have no idea what an extension is, and would be appalled if they bumped into one......

I just happen to be a VERY big fan of Nick's "Labor of Lust", and know fully well what is meant by the above quote (***ahem***)...

Not something that I can put in here without a r-17 rating, however...

Smallfaces1 · Post by **Smallfaces1** » Sun Nov 09, 2003 5:33 am

"Porn is good. Without it we'd all be stuck in the 20's,30's,40's etc not daring to speak of sex and only having having it on our wedding nights!"

I know what i mean in my head! just came out wrong

Copenhagen Fan · Post by **Copenhagen Fan** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 3:40 am

bambooneedle wrote:...but the question is, did it take years of extra hardcore porn to come to that conclusion?...

Good point Bamboozle! First it starts off with a little porn....then it escalates into the peep shows...then it ends up in the gutter! Porn is kinda like pot....once you smoke it...you eventually end up shooting heroin......

PlaythingOrPet · Post by **PlaythingOrPet** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 5:40 am

For Cope and others: Men & Porn

Don't let the kiddies see this, people.

Copenhagen Fan · Post by **Copenhagen Fan** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:23 am

I think porn sucks...it's like eating a bag of Doritos.....it temps you, you can't stop, but are never happy afterwards....

I prefer to live out my own fantasies rather than watch others do it for me.

bambooneedle · Post by **bambooneedle** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:43 am

I think porn sucks too, Cope. And I resent the generalization that seems to be made in that article that we men are a bunch of hopeless wankers... how would that guy know? He is just trying to justify his lifetime of self-abuse.

laughingcrow · Post by **laughingcrow** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 7:31 am

Physiologically, is it not believed at the moment that men that don't masturbate are at a greater risk of testicular cancer (that is if they're not having regular sex)...build up of non-used sperm and all that, as not all of it is recycled. Plus, release of chemicals into the blood stream and ergo brain, mean that wankers are a lot calmer than non-wankers

bambooneedle · Post by **bambooneedle** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 7:39 am

There's nothing wrong with the odd wank, plus studies have proven that if you don't you have more wet dreams anyway. Anyway, you don't need porn to wank, only if you have no imagination.

Copenhagen Fan · Post by **Copenhagen Fan** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:08 am

I have nothing against wanking...but it's just not for me any more....It does not turn me on in the least.....my poor girlfriend wishes I would take it up again...but why practice self abuse, when one can abuse others????

A rope leash · Post by **A rope leash** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 3:23 pm

That's funny Cope, but sometimes "others" aren't tight enough.

This is good:

http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2003/102703.asp

Don't forget to click on the Ashcroft link...

bobster · Post by **bobster** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 5:48 pm

Boy With A Problem wrote:
Re: Porn. My take on the subject is that it all takes place in an alternate dimension called, naturally, the Pornoverse.
I was under the impression most of it took place up in the Valley.[/b]

The San Fernando Valley may, in fact, offer an entryway into the pornoverse, but it is not in fact the actual pornoverse. It is just where they make porno, which is different.

Still, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, I tested BWAPs theory. I walked in on several lesbian couples, and instead of being asked to "join the fun," I was maced, pepper sprayed, and forced to wear plaid.

Otis Westinghouse · Post by **Otis Westinghouse** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:45 pm

laughingcrow wrote:Physiologically, is it not believed at the moment that men that don't masturbate are at a greater risk of testicular cancer (that is if they're not having regular sex)...build up of non-used sperm and all that, as not all of it is recycled.

You mean 'it is believed', no? There are other ways to release sperm than wanking, by the way!

Goody2Shoes · Post by **Goody2Shoes** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 7:37 pm

Pardon the interruption, but I love that term, wank. To wank. It's poetry, nearly.

Back to the Pornoverse.

Tim(e) · Post by **Tim(e)** » Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:45 pm

Otis Westinghouse wrote:You mean 'it is believed', no? There are other ways to release sperm than wanking, by the way!

Yes, as a froteur, I must concur!

bambooneedle · Post by **bambooneedle** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 12:46 am

"It is believed" is what I thought I read, hence my response. LC, did you edit that?

Copenhagen Fan · Post by **Copenhagen Fan** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:13 am

Rope....In my world everything's tight..

Copenhagen Fan · Post by **Copenhagen Fan** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:13 am

Bamboozle....I never knew you were so hot!! Wanna slide my tube steak into you.....

laughingcrow · Post by **laughingcrow** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 10:40 am

sorry guys reading that again it is confusing, yes it is believed at the mo by some, but I tend to write on the internet as I might say something. So, 'is it not believed' means 'it is', but im saying it with a question mark at the end! Do you not see what I'm saying?

Otis Westinghouse · Post by **Otis Westinghouse** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 6:18 pm

I do now, but the lack of a question mark led me/us to read 'it is' for 'is it'. A rhetorical question still needs its mark. I suspect it's all the cancer-reducing self-abuse enfeebling your mind.

selfmademug · Post by **selfmademug** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 2:14 am

My goodness the turn this thread has taken... BTW Crow, I gotcha right away.

I also love the term 'wank'. I think if Americans had such a nice fun term for masturbation it might fix a lot of things over here. For that matter I think there should be an equally felxible and evocative term just for girlwanking. Perhaps there is and I'm just too stodgy to know it...?

Copenhagen Fan · Post by **Copenhagen Fan** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 3:47 am

Jelly Beanz...there are hundreds of American expressions for wanking...! "Choking the Chicken", "Smashing the Bishop", ...etc...

but GIRLWANKING is called "Stiring the Stew"...

in Danish......"at tage en spiller".....(to take a player)

Elvis Costello Fan Forum

Board Couples

Re: porn is good

awd

The truth