Steve Earle vs. Bill O'Reilly

This is for all non-EC or peripheral-EC topics. We all know how much we love talking about 'The Man' but sometimes we have other interests.
Post Reply
User avatar
El Vez
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Heart Attack & Vine

Steve Earle vs. Bill O'Reilly

Post by El Vez »

Steve Earle will be a guest on The O'Reilly Factor on November 3rd. As Steve Earle himself put it, "The deal is he'll keep interrupting me and eventually tell me to shut up." The hardcore troubadour also stated that shows such as The O'Reilly Factor are to political debate what professional wrestling is to reality. I'd say that this is a VCR-worthy moment, but he's right about the content of the segment. O'Reilly will flip out for five minutes and then wrap it up and move on to the next segment. Nothing substantial but it will be good for some free publicity for Earle.
User avatar
sulkygirl
Posts: 531
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:22 pm
Location: The Absolute Armpit of the USA--Yakima, Washington (***cough***)

Post by sulkygirl »

Monday Night???

May have to watch that (if I'm not too drunk...)

8)
"Love can be stranger than fiction..."
Misha
Posts: 733
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:59 pm
Location: Northern Cold England, and Los Angeles, CA

Post by Misha »

Oh, no Sulky, if you are going to watch Rantin Bill, I suggest you get drunk first, it will prevent you harming your television set...
Where are the strong?

Who are the trusted?
bobster
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 12:29 am
Location: North Hollywood, CA

Post by bobster »

The worst thing about O'Reilly is that he claims to be putting out a responsible news shows and lies about stuff after it happens. (He claimed on that now-fabled NPR "Fresh Air" appearance that the Harper's column was cut so as not to include the more "offensive" statements by the guy he threw off the air -- which wasn't true. The Harper's article included that and appeared to be complete).

Then, of course, he goes ballistic if you call him a lier.

The good news, though, is that Fox is starting to come under more scrutiny and it's editorial policies are getting some much needed coverage (there was that ex employee who gave out info on the highly opinionated daily memos and the like).

In fact, right after the Al Franken flap, the TV's at my gym -- previously 50% of which were set permanently on Fox -- were switched to MSNBC! A small victory, perhaps. But still, significantly reduces my stress level while I'm there. (Though Joe Scarborough's a dickface, IMHO.)

Actually, the true political equivalent of wrestling was Wally George, who recently retired from local television out here. (After a while, I suspect he couldn't get real liberals to come on his show, so I think most of his guests were phonies.)

And here's a fun fact. Wally is Rebecca DeMorney's dad!
http://www.forwardtoyesterday.com -- Where "hopelessly dated" is a compliment!
laughingcrow
Posts: 2476
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:35 am

Post by laughingcrow »

Steve Martin vs Bill Cosby...

who'd win in a duel?
User avatar
spooky girlfriend
Site Admin
Posts: 3007
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 5:19 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Contact:

Post by spooky girlfriend »

Steve Martin :)
bobster
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 12:29 am
Location: North Hollywood, CA

Post by bobster »

Don't they get along? Have they had a public disagreement that I missed, or are we just comparing? (Personally, my money is on Cosby. Tough old bird.)
http://www.forwardtoyesterday.com -- Where "hopelessly dated" is a compliment!
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

Scarborough is all that and then some, Bobster. But I still really like MSNBC best of all the cable news. And I think Chris Matthews is great.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
bobster
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 12:29 am
Location: North Hollywood, CA

Post by bobster »

noiseradio wrote:And I think Chris Matthews is great.
He's okay I guess, a bright guy -- it's just sad that a right leaning neoliberal like him is the closest thing you have to a progressive talk show host. He actually seems (and that's the key word) more liberal lately, probably in reaction to how extreme Bush is getting.

I do like Darrell Hammond's impression of him an awful lot....
http://www.forwardtoyesterday.com -- Where "hopelessly dated" is a compliment!
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

My thinking he's great doesn't mean I agree with him. A lot of times I don't. But I love his show. He's really tough on guests, but not in the Bill O'Reilly shrill sort of way. He knows what he's talking about and he doesn't let people get away with very much. And he's equally hard on everyone. I saw him rip apart John Edwards one night, and then rip apart the head of the RNC the next. Just shot all their talking points to hell. But not ina disrespectful way. The effect was to force both guests to talk off script, which they proceeded to do with varrying levels of success. Edwards finally started talking about his ideas instead of throwing bumper sticker slogans out. And the chariman of the RNC, while less articulate, still sounded more like a person and less like a puppet. He's still a puppet, but it was a testament to Matthews' abilities that he came across as human at all.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
User avatar
A rope leash
Posts: 1835
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: southern misery, USA

Tied up

Post by A rope leash »

Noise -

I've always thought that Chris Mathews was kept on a tight leash. Apparently, he gave a speech recently that proves it:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=35378
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

Is it because he doesn't say this on the show that he's on a short leash? I just want to be sure I understand. His personal opinions may well be kept to himself to some degree on the air. That doesn't bother me unless he's being two-faced about it (like Bill O'Reilly). In other words, if he praises Bush on the war on the air and skewers him off air. I have not heard him do that. The leash says more about the corporate media moguls who edit the program (Microsoft and NBC, both of which favor conservative administrations) than it does about Matthews himself.

But I thank you for bringing that article to my attention. I will watch Hardball next time with it in mind. We'll see how Matthews' statements in the speech match his on-air words.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
bobster
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 12:29 am
Location: North Hollywood, CA

Post by bobster »

I had actually assumed that Matthew was a more of a Joe Lieberman "democrat in name only" type neoconservative until I saw part of another talk he gave at USC, I think. (It was on one of those local cable channels out here.)

Of course, that can be okay -- I just get pissed off that this is what passes for liberal these days.

Anyhow, in what I saw, Matthews said similar stuff and I was wondering where the hell this guy came from. (Though he did endorse Arnold for governor, though he said his wife wanted to kill him for that.)

I knew he was against Iraq, but the level of his criticism really surprised me. And he's for Dean! (Which, believe, doesn't make a liberal -- it just makes him smart!)
http://www.forwardtoyesterday.com -- Where "hopelessly dated" is a compliment!
User avatar
cosmos
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 2:36 pm
Location: The land of Cosmosis

Post by cosmos »

Anybody see what happened regarding Earle's appearance on O'Reilly's show? Just curious......
User avatar
verbal gymnastics
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 6:44 am
Location: Magic lantern land

Post by verbal gymnastics »

laughingcrow wrote:Steve Martin vs Bill Cosby...

who'd win in a duel?
As a fight or a battle of wits?

I'd go for Steve Martin for the former, Bill Cosby for the latter.
Who’s this kid with his mumbo jumbo?
laughingcrow
Posts: 2476
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:35 am

Post by laughingcrow »

Steve Martin does have his sarcasm ray, but I'm not sure it'd be any match for Bill's colourful-sweater grip, and super fertile action!

plus...Bill was the Ghost dad remember...thank the lord Cosby doesn't use his power for evil! :D

Image
Post Reply